The so called "back-to-the-river movement" has plans to build a pedestrian bridge connecting Omaha and Iowa. I propose calling the new bridge the "Bridge of Love," baby. 
Why call the new bridge the "Bridge of Love?" Well, allow me to explain. First, the bridge idea has been brewing for nine years like a dormant, embryonic love child. It's time to let that thing out. Second, from above, the bridge is shaped like a sperm in mid tail whip, swimming from a promiscuous Council Bluffs to a more than willing Omaha. Third, the masts of the bridge look like a pitched tent, if you know what I mean. Forth, the trees on the Iowa side look like a grove of pubes, chomp, chomp. Fifth, the bridge just looks beautiful at night, so why not call it the "Bridge of Love" between lovers Omaha and Council Bluffs? Sixth, many homeless people will fornicate on the bridge's benches. Seventh, the new bridge construction will disrupt pallid sturgeon mating, and we all know how perverted those little fish are. They don't love each other at all, at least not like humans love each other.

At last, the two people of these great states will be able to unite through recreation and casual sex on the "Bridge of Love." The question will be whether Iowans and Nebraskans can remain chaste for two years and wait for the bridge to be completed. Or will we swim to unification through the muddy Missouri, and, with our feet sloshing on the polluted banks, will we face our long lost brothers and say, "brother, I love you?" All we can know with any certainty is that the bridge will be a monument that attracts the casual rambler, homeless fornicators, bike gangs, and baby walkers alike. You know the homeless of Omaha have to be thinking, "Yes, a bridge that leads to a forest area where we can hunt squirrels." Or, would it be better if the bridge led to a 100 foot drop off into a pit where the homeless could fall into? No, that is a horrible idea.
A lot of the people I know probably think this project is a poor investment, and if they know anything about political rhetoric they may even call it a pork barrel project of the federal government, which is providing $19 million in tax dollars.
“We could use the money for education, lowering taxes, or other business incentives,” they would say. Or they would mutter, “That’s just stupid. Iowa sucks.” Or they would say that private business should be given tax incentives to embark on such a project. However, the bids were competitive with a Kansas City company pulling out for the win. But I say, "do it for the kids man. The KIDS and the homeless and those baby walkers and ramblers."

I can’t wait for the bridge to be completed. It will add much needed aesthetic qualia to the river front.
John K. Green, a citizen member of the review committee, said the committee chose the design because its two towers best symbolized the partnership between the two states and two cities.
Tis true then, this bridge will help establish a bond between these two great states that has grown weak over the last century but will finally be revived when we can shake hands and dry hump together on the "Bridge of Love."